Get in touch
Please contact us to discuss how working with Myriad can maximise and secure R&D funding opportunities for your business.
Contact usSpecial Purpose Vehicles can lift a Theatre Tax Relief claim from around 20% to 36% of core costs. Here's how SPVs work and what HMRC expects.
A profit-making theatre production and a loss-making one can claim Theatre Tax Relief on exactly the same costs and end up with very different results. One gets a modest reduction in its Corporation Tax bill. The other gets a cash credit worth close to double that, paid out by HMRC regardless of whether the wider business made money.
The difference comes down to structure, not spend. Running a production through its own Special Purpose Vehicle, or SPV, is how most theatre companies close that gap deliberately rather than leaving it to chance.
An SPV is a separate limited company set up for a single purpose, in this case, a specific theatre production. It sits alongside your existing organisation (the parent), rather than replacing it, and it's the entity that actually produces, runs and closes the show.
An SPV can be owned by a charity, a company limited by guarantee, a commercial group, or jointly by co-producers working together on the same show. Setting one up is quick and inexpensive but provides real value for your claim.
Two structures come up most often. Smaller productions, or several running at once with modest budgets, are usually grouped through a single SPV, since running separate companies for each one isn't worth the extra accounting and Companies House administration. Larger productions are usually given their own SPV each, which ring-fences one show from another and avoids one production's costs or losses becoming tangled up with another's.
Theatre Tax Relief offers claimants a benefit in two ways, depending on their taxable income. A profitable production gets its Theatre Tax Relief as a reduction in Corporation Tax. A loss-making or break-even production can surrender its loss instead and will receive a cash credit from HMRC at a materially higher rate.
The rates for surrendering your loss depend on when the costs were incurred and whether the production is touring:
|
Production Type |
Rate until 31 March 2025 |
Rate from 1 April 2025 |
|
Touring Productions |
50% |
45% |
|
Non-Touring Productions |
45% |
40% |
Here's what that looks like per £100,000 of UK core expenditure, using the 80% cap that applies to a TTR claim with all UK costs:
Company A runs a non-touring production with £100,000 of UK core expenditure. If the production is profitable and pays Corporation Tax at the main 25% rate, its £80,000 additional deduction (the 80% cap applied to its core expenditure) reduces taxable profit and saves £20,000 in tax.
Company B instead runs the same production through its own SPV and the SPV reaches break-even; that same £80,000 becomes a surrenderable loss. Surrendered at the current 40% non-touring rate, it produces a £32,000 cash credit, £12,000 more than the tax saving alone.
Here’s how this looks for companies with the exact same claim expenditure, but different taxable positions:
|
Production position |
Effective rate |
Benefit on £100,000 of core expenditure |
|
Profit-making, main Corporation Tax rate |
20% |
£20,000 |
|
Profit-making, small companies rate |
15.2% |
£15,200 |
|
Loss-making or break-even, non-touring |
32% |
£32,000 |
|
Loss-making or break-even, touring |
36% |
£36,000 |
Getting to break-even isn't just an accounting choice. It must be built into how money moves between the SPV and its parent:
For productions with a straightforward budget, this is a light-touch structure. It becomes more involved for co-productions or shows split across several SPVs, but the underlying mechanics stay the same.
Four documents underpin the structure, and HMRC will expect to see them if your claim is ever checked:
The production agreement is the one that matters most. It sets the commissioning fee, establishes that the SPV is the production company negotiating contracts and making decisions, and confirms that any connected-party costs are recharged at arm's length.
Worth noting: what you recharge and what you can claim aren't always the same figure. If a connected party provides services at no cost, for example a volunteer role you'd normally have to pay for, you can recharge that at a fair market rate for governance purposes, but you can only claim the actual economic cost incurred, which in that case is nothing.
HMRC wants to see the SPV genuinely producing, running and closing the production: negotiating contracts itself, making the creative and technical decisions, and paying suppliers directly rather than the parent doing so on its behalf. On a compliance check, that means copies of contracts held in the SPV's name and evidence of the SPV's own funds flow, not just the parent's ledger with a recharge line in it.
Using an SPV doesn't, by itself, increase your risk of a compliance check. The large majority of Theatre Tax Relief claims already run through a dedicated production entity, and HMRC recognises this as good practice: it separates costs cleanly and makes a claim easier to evidence, not harder.
What does increase your risk is an SPV that can't demonstrate genuine involvement in the production it's claiming for. If you're setting one up for a new production, incorporate it as early as possible; you're restricted in what pre-formation costs you can bring across, so waiting until the show is already under way limits what the SPV can properly claim.
An SPV can register for VAT like any other company, but it needs a taxable supply to do so, and that supply is the commissioning fee it charges its parent. If the parent has a cultural VAT exemption, charging it VAT can leave that VAT irrecoverable at the parent's end, so some VAT leakage is often unavoidable. A group VAT registration is one option, though it brings the parent's exemption back into the picture for the group as a whole.
The two taxes pull in different directions here, and there's no single answer that fits every structure. In practice, it's worth keeping VAT and Theatre Tax Relief as separate questions rather than letting VAT planning complicate the SPV structure that's securing your TTR entitlement.
Charities and other non-profits generally hold their SPV's shares directly, or through trustees where the charity itself isn't incorporated. The reasoning behind the SPV matters more here than anywhere else: because charities are typically exempt from Corporation Tax, a profitable production gives them no tax bill to reduce, and any Theatre Tax Relief entitlement on it simply goes unused. A loss-making or break-even SPV is the only route to a cash credit a charity can actually receive. For the fuller picture, including the numbers behind it, see our guide to Special Purpose Vehicles for charities.
If you're planning a production and want to know whether an SPV makes sense for your situation, or you'd like Myriad to draft the agreements and prepare the claim from start to finish, get in touch and we'll talk you through it.
Special Purpose Vehicles can lift a Theatre Tax Relief claim from around 20% to 36% of core costs. Here's how SPVs work and what HMRC expects.
Claiming Theatre Tax Relief? Follow our step-by-step guide to qualifying costs, the AIF, CT600P submission and HMRC's claim deadlines.
R&D tax claim timing explained: the two-year claim deadline, the six-month ANF deadline, and why waiting rarely benefits your claim.
Please contact us to discuss how working with Myriad can maximise and secure R&D funding opportunities for your business.
Contact us